Archive

Archive for June 8th, 2010

Rogue News_Myrtle Beach City Helmet Ordinance Fails in Court

June 8th, 2010 No comments

CONCLUSION

We find that the City Helmet Ordinance fails under implied field preemption due to the need for statewide uniformity and therefore issue a declaratory judgment invalidating the ordinance. Moreover, we hold that certain Motorcycle Ordinances were impliedly repealed by the ordinance repealing the administrative hearing system.

JUDGMENT FOR PETITIONERS.

TOAL, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
[1] Petitioners contend the following ordinances were invalidated by repeal of the ordinance establishing the administrative hearing system: 2008-61 (accommodations restrictions); 2008-62 (consumption and open possession of alcohol in parking areas); 2008-63 (use of parking lots for non-parking activities); 2008-64 (helmet and eyewear requirements for cycles and mopeds); 2008-65 (parking of trailers on public streets or unlicensed private lots); 2008-66 (convenience store and premises security); and 2008-67 (minor or juvenile curfew).
[2]Because we find that the Helmet Ordinance fails under implied field preemption, we need not reach Petitioners’ remaining preemption issues. See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613, 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (appellate court need not discuss remaining issues when disposition of prior issue is dispositive). Additionally, we need not address Petitioners’ request for a writ of prohibition barring the municipal court from exercising jurisdiction over the alleged ordinance violations. See Sangamo Weston, Inc. v. National Surety Corp., 307 S.C. 143, 148, 414 S.E.2d 127, 130 (1992) (“This court will not issue advisory opinions . . . .”).
[3] Though Petitioners phrase their argument as whether the administrative hearing ordinance is “severable” from the Motorcycle Ordinances, Petitioners actually argue implied repeal.

Read more: http://www.thesunnews.com/2010/06/08/1519956/read-the-sc-supreme-courts-opinion.html#ixzz0qHI2KKuj

Rogue
Sturgis Freedom Fighters
Motorcycle Hall Of Fame Member 2005
www.bikerrogue.com

Rogue News 06-08-10

June 8th, 2010 No comments

Cops want to stop people from photographing them, especially when they are doing wrong. This also appears to apply to professional journalist. Why is the PRESS not all over this? 

http://gizmodo.com/5553765/are-cameras-the-new-guns?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmodo%2Ffull+%28Gizmodo%29

Are Cameras the New Guns?

In response to a flood of Facebook and YouTube videos that depict police abuse, a new trend in law enforcement is gaining popularity. In at least three states, it is now illegal to record any on-duty police officer.

Even if the encounter involves you and may be necessary to your defense, and even if the recording is on a public street where no expectation of privacy exists.

The legal justification for arresting the “shooter” rests on existing wiretapping or eavesdropping laws, with statutes against obstructing law enforcement sometimes cited. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland are among the 12 states in which all parties must consent for a recording to be legal unless, as with TV news crews, it is obvious to all that recording is underway. Since the police do not consent, the camera-wielder can be arrested. Most all-party-consent states also include an exception for recording in public places where “no expectation of privacy exists” (Illinois does not) but in practice this exception is not being recognized.

Massachusetts attorney June Jensen represented Simon Glik who was arrested for such a recording. She explained, “[T]he statute has been misconstrued by Boston police. You could go to the Boston Common and snap pictures and record if you want.” Legal scholar and professor Jonathan Turley agrees, “The police are basing this claim on a ridiculous reading of the two-party consent surveillance law – requiring all parties to consent to being taped. I have written in the area of surveillance law and can say that this is utter nonsense.”

The courts, however, disagree. A few weeks ago, an Illinois judge rejected a motion to dismiss an eavesdropping charge against Christopher Drew, who recorded his own arrest for selling one-dollar artwork on the streets of Chicago. Although the misdemeanor charges of not having a peddler’s license and peddling in a prohibited area were dropped, Drew is being prosecuted for illegal recording, a Class I felony punishable by 4 to 15 years in prison.

In 2001, when Michael Hyde was arrested for criminally violating the state’s electronic surveillance law – aka recording a police encounter – the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld his conviction 4-2. In dissent, Chief Justice Margaret Marshall stated, “Citizens have a particularly important role to play when the official conduct at issue is that of the police. Their role cannot be performed if citizens must fear criminal reprisals….” (Note: In some states it is the audio alone that makes the recording illegal.)

The selection of “shooters” targeted for prosecution do, indeed, suggest a pattern of either reprisal or an attempt to intimidate.

Glik captured a police action on his cellphone to document what he considered to be excessive force. He was not only arrested, his phone was also seized.

On his website Drew wrote, “Myself and three other artists who documented my actions tried for two months to get the police to arrest me for selling art downtown so we could test the Chicago peddlers license law. The police hesitated for two months because they knew it would mean a federal court case. With this felony charge they are trying to avoid this test and ruin me financially and stain my credibility.”

Hyde used his recording to file a harassment complaint against the police. After doing so, he was criminally charged.

In short, recordings that are flattering to the police – an officer kissing a baby or rescuing a dog – will almost certainly not result in prosecution even if they are done without all-party consent. The only people who seem prone to prosecution are those who embarrass or confront the police, or who somehow challenge the law. If true, then the prosecutions are a form of social control to discourage criticism of the police or simple dissent.

A recent arrest in Maryland is both typical and disturbing.

On March 5, 24-year-old Anthony John Graber III’s motorcycle was pulled over for speeding. He is currently facing criminal charges for a video he recorded on his helmet-mounted camera during the traffic stop.

The case is disturbing because:

1) Graber was not arrested immediately. Ten days after the encounter, he posted some of he material to YouTube, and it embarrassed Trooper J. D. Uhler. The trooper, who was in plainclothes and an unmarked car, jumped out waving a gun and screaming. Only later did Uhler identify himself as a police officer. When the YouTube video was discovered the police got a warrant against Graber, searched his parents’ house (where he presumably lives), seized equipment, and charged him with a violation of wiretapping law.

2) Baltimore criminal defense attorney Steven D. Silverman said he had never heard of the Maryland wiretap law being used in this manner. In other words, Maryland has joined the expanding trend of criminalizing the act of recording police abuse. Silverman surmises, “It’s more [about] ‘contempt of cop’ than the violation of the wiretapping law.”

3) Police spokesman Gregory M. Shipley is defending the pursuit of charges against Graber, denying that it is “some capricious retribution” and citing as justification the particularly egregious nature of Graber’s traffic offenses. Oddly, however, the offenses were not so egregious as to cause his arrest before the video appeared.

Almost without exception, police officials have staunchly supported the arresting officers. This argues strongly against the idea that some rogue officers are overreacting or that a few cops have something to hide. “Arrest those who record the police” appears to be official policy, and it’s backed by the courts.

Carlos Miller at the Photography Is Not A Crime website offers an explanation: “For the second time in less than a month, a police officer was convicted from evidence obtained from a videotape. The first officer to be convicted was New York City Police Officer Patrick Pogan, who would never have stood trial had it not been for a video posted on Youtube showing him body slamming a bicyclist before charging him with assault on an officer. The second officer to be convicted was Ottawa Hills (Ohio) Police Officer Thomas White, who shot a motorcyclist in the back after a traffic stop, permanently paralyzing the 24-year-old man.”

When the police act as though cameras were the equivalent of guns pointed at them, there is a sense in which they are correct. Cameras have become the most effective weapon that ordinary people have to protect against and to expose police abuse. And the police want it to stop.

Happily, even as the practice of arresting “shooters” expands, there are signs of effective backlash. At least one Pennsylvania jurisdiction has reaffirmed the right to video in public places. As part of a settlement with ACLU attorneys who represented an arrested “shooter,” the police in Spring City and East Vincent Township adopted a written policy allowing the recording of on-duty policemen.

As journalist Radley Balko declares, “State legislatures should consider passing laws explicitly making it legal to record on-duty law enforcement officials.”

Wendy McElroy is the author of several books on anarchism and feminism. She maintains the iconoclastic website ifeminists.net as well as an active blog at wendymcelroy.com.

Rogue

Sturgis Freedom Fighters

Motorcycle Hall Of Fame Member 2005

www.bikerrogue.com

Ride To Work Day

June 8th, 2010 No comments

Hello Everyone,

The 19th Annual International Ride to Work Day will be on June 21st this year. After the great time we had last year, we will proudly host our 2nd annual party from 3pm-7pm at our office at 1275 Nebraska Avenue in Palm Harbor. Sandwiches, soft drinks and desserts will be served.  Please ride on by, meet our staff, and help celebrate our shared love of riding with the wind in our hair. Please RSVP to Rhett@lawfran if you plan on attending.

Our law firm represents people that have been injured in motorcycle and automobile accidents.  If you have any questions about your insurance coverage or need any additional information regarding a motorcycle or automobile accident please contact our office at (727) 784-8191 or 866-LAW-FRAN. We will be happy to provide a free consultation.

Attorney Fran Haasch
Palm Harbor

Failure to Negotiate a Curve:

June 8th, 2010 No comments

Motorman’s Tips, tricks, and Techniques

Failure to Negotiate a Curve:

I know I’ve discussed this type of incident before, but I feel compelled to go over it once again since it happens so often. Here are the circumstances of the failure to negotiate a curve I have witnessed.

I was 5th in a staggered group of 8 riders. We were cruising down the Ozello Trail in Homosassa at a leisurely pace. If you’re not familiar with the Ozello Trail, it’s a winding two lane road which winds for five or six miles from U.S. 19 to the Gulf of Mexico. On both sides of the road there’s a grassy, soft shoulder about six feet wide that dips into the narrow Homosassa River. Most of the turns can be taken at 40mph, but our pace was closer to 20mph. The rider in front of me was on a two-or three-year-old Fat boy and had over 30 years of riding experience.

As we entered the second half of an S curve, I noticed the last part curving to the left had a slight decreasing radius. The rider in front of me was leaning slightly more than the bike would lean when it was sitting on the kickstand. In other words, it was nowhere near its lean limit. When the rider on the Fat boy realized the turn was becoming sharper she panicked, let off the throttle, straightened up the bike, then looked at the edge of the road and the river … right off the road and into the river she went. Amazingly, her only injuries were a few cuts and bruises.

Now the question is, why did an experienced rider straighten up her bike and ride right off the road, and how can you prevent this from happening to you?

There are several reasons for the crash. First, she didn’t know her bike’s lean limits; therefore, she thought she was at that limit when she actually was nowhere near it.  Second, she was focused on the bike in front of her, instead of at the end of the turn. By not focusing far enough in front of her the decreasing radius came into her view very quickly, which made her think she was going much faster than her actual speed. Last but not least, she fixated on the River— and since your hands follow your eyes, that’s where she went.

To avoid this type of crash, find your bike’s lean limits under controlled conditions.  Practice turning tight circles in a parking lot, until you get comfortable leaning your bike until the pegs or boards scrape the ground, then practice making wider turns in both directions at speeds above 15mph. Keep your head and eyes UP and look well ahead of the bike. Never look down or anyplace you don’t want the bike to go. Remember at speeds above 15mph you’re counter-steering. Push left to go left, push right to go right.  In other words, if you need to turn sharper in a left turn push harder on the left grip. It’s the same to the right.

Never, ever, focus on the bike directly in front of you. Instead, focus on the end of the turn – do your braking before you enter the curve then release the brakes and roll on the throttle. This will cause the bike to rise up on its suspension and give it more lean angle before any hard parts hit the tarmac. That’s all there is to it. It just takes a little practice of the proper techniques. If you wait until you’re in the middle of a curve on a winding road with water, guardrails, or even a cliff off the shoulder, it’s too late to practice.

You can either rely on dumb luck to get you through a tricky situation or you can rely on skill. It’s up to you.

My Ride Like a Pro DVDs and Book will show you how to be the master of your machine. Call me toll-free, 1-866-868-7433.  I’ve got a DVD for every skill level of rider. From beginner to seasoned rider, I’ll show you what you need to master and learn how to do it the proper way. Check out my website, www.ridelikeapro.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 JERRY MOTORMAN PALLADINO

The World’s Fastest Indian

June 8th, 2010 No comments

THE WORLD’S FASTEST INDIAN

STARRING ANTHONY HOPKINS

WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY ROGER DONALDSON

Synopsis

Anthony Hopkins stars as Burt Munro, a man who never let the dreams of youth fade.

In the late 1960s, after a lifetime of perfecting his classic Indian motorcycle, Burt sets off from the bottom of the world, Invercargill, New Zealand, to clock his bike at the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah. With all odds against him, Burt puts his irrepressible kiwi spirit to the test, braving the new world on a shoestring budget. He makes fast friends of many he encounters along the way who find themselves swept up in his energy and singular determination. Burt’s quest culminates in an unlikely conclusion and remains legendary within the motorcycle community to this day.

THE WORLD’S FASTEST INDIAN is a script based on Burt Munro’s journeys to Bonneville during the 1960s. It follows the road to fulfilling a dream – and the magic in the true story of a man who believed, “If it’s hard, work harder; if it’s impossible, work harder still. Give it whatever it takes, but do it.”

Playing this eccentric and lovable character is Academy Award Winner? Anthony Hopkins. THE WORLD’S FASTEST INDIAN captures Munro with all his power, his determination, his creativity, his charm, his eccentricity – told through the eyes of a director who knew the man personally, and has never wavered from his own dream of making Munro’s story.

Director’s Statement

This project has been a passion of mine since I completed a documentary about Burt Munro back in 1972, Offerings to the God of Speed.

Burt Munro was a most extraordinary New Zealander . . .  a “one-off” original.

I first met him late one winter’s night in Invercargill in 1971. Burt was excited that some young filmmakers had come all the way down from Auckland to meet this old man and discuss the possibility of a documentary about his exploits. In his enthusiasm he wheeled an old 1920 Indian Scout motorcycle out of the cinder-block shed where he lived and jumped on the kick- starter. The engine roared to life; a sound to split your eardrums. Lights started coming on in the neighbors’ houses. When Burt finally stopped revving the engine and you could once again hear, the night was filled with the yells of his disapproving neighbors suggesting that 11 p.m. was an inappropriate time to start “demonstrating” his un-muffled motorcycle.

I WAS HOOKED . . . and so I set about with my hand-wind Bolex making my short film about Burt Munro’s life . . . shooting him in the South Island and accompanying him to the Bonneville Salt Flats as he attempted to set a land speed record on his ancient bike.

After the documentary was shown to a favorable reception on New Zealand television, I couldn’t get Burt out of my mind. I felt that my film really didn’t do this eccentric and talented New Zealander justice. So after Burt died in 1978, I decided to try and make a feature film based on his exploits.

I had a particular vision for this project: the story of a man of extraordinary belief in himself and his dream. Several times over the past two decades I had offers to fund this film if I rewrote the script to tell what others considered to be a more ‘marketable’ story. I was determined not to compromise my vision of the story in this way and was prepared to wait until I could make this film as I intended.

Two years ago, after I completed production on The Recruit, I decided that rather than sign up for another Hollywood movie I would return to Burt’s story. It was now or never. I believed this could be an uplifting and inspirational story in the spirit of such films as Rocky, Billy Elliot and Chariots of Fire. I re-wrote the script until I felt I had finally cracked it. I had what I believed to be the basis for an entertaining film without any compromises; a story that really captured the spirit of Burt Munro.

I have been intrigued by Burt’s story for many, many years; some would say my obsession with this film matches Burt’s obsession with his bike.

Cast

Anthony Hopkins – Burt Munro
Jessica Cauffiel – Wendy
Saginaw Grant – Jake
Diane Ladd – Ada
Chris Lawford – Jim
Aaron Murphy – Sam
Paul Rodriguez – Fernando
Annie Whittle – Fran
Chris Williams – Tina Washington
Roger Donaldson – Writer/Director/Producer
Interviews

Roger Donaldson

What attracted you to Burt Munro’s story?
One thing about New Zealand is that if you are determined to do something, this is a country where things can happen. You don’t get held back by bureaucracy or people having a preconceived idea of what a filmmaker is or what sort of training you should have or if you’ve got the wherewithal to go out and do it. This is a country that’s always been very sympathetic to the ‘go, do it’ mentality and Burt Munro really did have that mentality.

He really did decide that he was going to make this old 1920 Indian motorcycle into the world’s fastest motorcycle, and he set about it in a way only New Zealanders really know how to do. We call it a number eight wire mentality: take what you have around you and make the most of it and don’t bitch and moan about what you don’t have.

I came to meet Burt Munro because my partner in my photographic business, Mike Smith and I were both crazy about motorbikes. We heard about this old boy Burt Munro, down in Invercargill, who had a motorcycle that was supposedly a land speed record holder. We made contact with Burt and he invited us down to Invercargill; he said “come down here and see my bike.”

I still remember when we turned up on Bainfield road where Burt lived. It was about ten o’clock at night by the time we got down there and Burt was so pleased to see us that he had to demonstrate his bike to us immediately. So he wheels his motorcycle outside to the back yard and gets it cranked up. Then there’s screaming, the noise, you can’t hear yourself talk let alone think, the lights are coming on at the neighbors houses, people are screaming and yelling “Burt you old bastard turn that motorbike off.” That was Burt Munro.

And from that first meeting with Burt I wanted to make a film about him. So we persuaded Burt, who didn’t plan on going back to America – this was in 1971 – but we said we’ll pay your fare one more time. So Mike and I went with Burt to America. I remember we had rented a Mustang car and Burt had bought himself an old Chev and the Chev was about as fast as the old Mustang. We were trying to do traveling shots of him making his way from Los Angeles to Bonneville; we’d race ahead of him at a hundred miles an hour and just get the camera nearly set up and Burt would stream past.

We went with Burt to Bonneville and there we shot some film about him which became the documentary that was screened on Television New Zealand in 1973, called “Offerings to the God of  Speed,” which were words that he had written in chalk in his old shed that he lived in.

On the background to making the film
Such humble beginnings; the documentary on Burt was made with no money and I was at the beginning of my film-making career. I’ve learned a lot, and I always thought that I never really did justice to the subject; I guess that’s why I became obsessed with making this movie about Burt.

It started out in 1979 before I even made my second feature film (Smash Palace, 1981). I think we’ve nearly had this movie financed several times already. After I finished my last feature film in the States, I just thought, I’ve been talking about this movie for so darned long and if I don’t make it I might as well admit that I’m never going to make it. So for the last 2 years I rewrote the script and then set about trying to raise the money for it. Gary Hannam – who’s been in there from the beginning, and I set out to track down money  around the world, and one of the things that really happened and got it off the ground was a Japanese investor, a woman who I had met doing publicity for movies in Japan. My wife, Marliese, kept in contact with her over the years and Megumi asked if I had any scripts that may be suitable for investing in, and I said I just happened to have one here in my back pocket, THE WORLD’S FASTEST INDIAN.

Megumi took the script back to Japan and they said, “We’re going to invest in this”; they loved it. They really were just knocked out by it. So once I had their commitment, I had something that I could hang trying to raise the rest of the money on. But it’s been a torturous, torturous trip to get there. …

Next I got Anthony Hopkins to commit to making the movie. So once I had some real serious casting in place for Burt, then I knew I had a movie, if I could get the finances together. And then I also realized that I had the problem that the Bonneville Salt Flats are only available and suitable at a certain time of the year, so unless I did it that year (2004) I’d have to wait at least a year. The chances (in a year’s time) of it happening really were pretty slim as Tony has many offers. Gary and I realized we would have to start spending our own money.

It was a go movie 3 weeks before production started, having built the bikes, having got a film crew working in Utah, with Gary and I paying the bills. A situation that everybody tells you is not really the greatest place for a filmmaker to be. … But in a way I think that I and Gary too, were so determined that we were going make this movie. And I think that the fact that we were prepared to spend our own money, and a lot of it, to make it come this far, gave other people a confidence to get involved as well, once they saw the passion that we had for it.

On Burt Munro
He was a character and I think that if we captured that great quality that he had about what he was doing with his life, we will have made a great film. He was really, really happy although there were things that happened in his life that I’m sure had an impact on him, like when he was 14, his twin brother was killed. I’m sure that must have had an impact on him. Not that he ever admitted it, but this was a guy who, as his grandson said, wanted to die with his boots on. …

This was a guy who really loved motorcycles and was obviously very talented in riding them and was also very talented in making them go fast. He also had an interesting philosophy on his life. And it is that philosophy about growing old and having dreams and ambition … that’s what I think that this movie is about, it’s less about his motorbike in a way, it’s less about motorcycles, it’s more about just the philosophy of life. What we’ve tried to do is build an entertaining, amusing, and hopefully touching script.

Anthony Hopkins

On getting involved with the project
Well I worked with Roger Donaldson back 20 years ago on The Bounty, 1983, in Tahiti and New Zealand. Then years passed by and I hadn’t seen Roger for a longtime, and then we were going to do a movie called Papa, about Ernest Hemingway, and that didn’t work out. And Roger was kind of disappointed and so was I; but that’s the way life is sometimes in movies.

And then he phoned – a strange coincidence – a few months ago. I just thought I would give him a call and see how he was. I wanted to know how he was after the disappointment of Hemingway, and he asked, “Tony did you get my message?” I said, “No.” He said, “I just left you a message.” “What?” He said, “I’ve got a script … you’re not phoning me to answer my message?” I said, “No.  I haven’t even picked up my messages this morning.”  He said, “Oh, well this is propitious or fortuitous. I’ve got the script here called THE WORLD’S FASTEST INDIAN. A beautiful story; I don’t know if you would be interested in playing a racing driver, a racing bloke.”

So I got the script that afternoon and I thought it was just terrific. It is a unique script, I don’t know what it is about it; it is just well written, very very well written, beautifully written, and so refreshing. It’s not the bang bang, of big Hollywood movies. It’s got much more variety and for me it’s a big change because it’s a real winner of a guy. I’ve had a good career playing psychopaths or uptight people, and I’m fed up with those, I don’t want to play any more of them. This is my life now, I’m a very happy guy and Burt Munro’s philosophy and character suits my temperament.

Comments on ‘The Bounty’ (1983), and Roger as director
Roger and I had our moments of animosity. Roger had his methods of dealing with people. He’s a New Zealander, and he had that, as we say in England, a kind of an antipodean chip on his shoulder. He was different, and I was younger and arrogant and all the rest of it. I was very impatient with people and especially directors, and if they wanted too many takes I would question … and he used to do a lot of takes, he’s a perfectionist.

Now 20 years have passed and I’m not only tolerant but I am respectful of what he does, and what directors do. He does it for a reason. I know that he knows that he wants a good movie and I don’t care if he does 50 takes. I hope he doesn’t have to do 50 takes because it’s a lot of time, but I respect him as a director and I like him as a guy, I think he’s a terrific fellow. You know the first few days I was wondering if he thought I would go berserk any moment. But those days are over you know—I was temperamental, I would get impatient with things. Now I think, oh it’s only a
Movie. … But I don’t mean that in a cynical way. It is finally [that] nothing is that important to get upset about, and I just roll with the punches and roll with the conditions now.

And he’s a great director to work with, one of the best I have worked with. I’ve worked with Spielberg and Oliver Stone and he’s there with that lot you know. He really is, in his films like No Way Out and Thirteen Days and, a wonderful director.

On Burt Munro
Well I’m no speed freak myself, but Burt Munro, in the documentary that Roger filmed, Burt loved speed. He was, I don’t know if he was obsessed with it, but he loved the thrill of speed, he said that you can live more in 5 minutes on a motorbike going high speed than you can in your whole lifetime. That was the challenge. I suppose there are obviously people who flirt with mortality. I mean, you’re taking a huge challenge, a courageous challenge to risk your life … Donald Campbell was the same, to break the world speed water record. And he was killed in the process, breaking the actual record, and he said he was scared every time he got into Bluebird.

But that was it – to overcome fear is the greatest virtuous courage and I think Burt is one of those characters, one of those guys. That’s his whole philosophy of life, to live life to the full, because “When you’re dead you’re a longtime dead” he says, and “Once you’re dead you never come back.” I’m not a speed thrill freak though – I’m a careful driver, so I don’t like speed. I used to when I was younger but now, I like to live

On establishing the character, Burt Munro
Well, I’m kind of mellowing into the part; getting the New Zealand accent. … And this is where Roger Donaldson is so easy. “Listen, it doesn’t matter, down in New Zealand they will probably criticize you for your accent” he said “but worldwide you’ll probably get away with it.” He said “It doesn’t matter anyway, do it your way make him yours, you’re Burt Munro.” But he checks me. He says “Flatten the vowels sounds out a bit and watch the R sounds.” And when I hear Burt Munro he sounds almost Cornish to me, or almost Irish, Devonshire or Cornish. He’s got those very beautiful round R sounds and it really sounds like Cornish to me.

On the script
It is such a good script, Roger wrote it and I’ll add little things here and there; it’s not written in stone. But it is such a good script you don’t need to change the structure of it, and I don’t want to replace lines. But I sometimes make a line sound more natural because I may have difficulty with the consonant sound which is too New Zealand for me and I’ll say well can I  … ? For example, I’ve got one coming which is “No harm in asking.” Well I don’t know if I can handle that, so I’ll say “Well I thought I would ask.” I don’t know, maybe I will just put it that way and say “I thought I’d ask,” which is easier. Little things like that, anything to make it simpler.

On working with Roger
If you have a director who has an equanimity in his temperament, that’s good. If you get someone shouting and screaming – and that can come from an actor as well and I’ve done that in my past and I admit it; that doesn’t help anyone. If you can express irritability take it aside instead of being public about it. … Some directors are vociferous and noisy and scream and shout and you can’t work like that.

With this crew, which is the best crew I have worked with in many years, why create trouble? Just get on with your job, learn your lines, as the guy’s preparing his lighting and the sound guys are doing their stuff, and the props and wardrobe people, everyone’s doing a job and that’s what it is. … That’s what it is, it’s a job and I’ve taken some years to learn how to settle into this kind of respect for people for what they’re doing. And maybe Burt’s spirit is around us, because he seemed to be such a decent fun man and I liked his wonderful sense of humor, when he only loved the ladies and says, “Well I think a nice couple of ladies around can help a party go.” You know, I love that bloke Burt, he was – he’s a great, great personality, probably a very generous man as well.

Join Fight Against New Tax Increase

June 8th, 2010 No comments

Candidate Urges Hillsborough Residents To Join Fight Against New Tax Increase

(Tampa, FL) – Brian Blair, Republican candidate for the District 47 seat in the Florida House of Representatives, is making it clear that he is against raising the sales tax in Hillsborough County to support a new light rail system.

“The Hillsborough Board of County Commissioners, led by Mark Sharpe (R), has already put a sales tax increase on the November ballot,” claimed Blair. “This would raise our sales tax from 7% to 8%.”

“It doesn’t sound like much when the proponents call it a ‘one cent’ tax increase,” added Blair, “ but in reality, Hillsborough County consumers will pay 14% more in sales tax if they vote ‘yes’ in November.”

“This is nothing more than ‘keeping up with the Jones.’”

“Jim Norman and Al Higginbotham voted against the referendum and Ken Hagan has raised significant concerns, indicating he doesn’t believe the initiative will come close to passing.”
That said, Brian Blair is taking no chances with the taxpayers’ dollars and cited several more reasons for his opposition to the new tax hike:

· The Hillsborough Area Regional Transit, or HART as it is called, took in $12, 789,430 in ticket sales last year and reported an operating loss of $63,481,153. The primary source for funding these losses is county property taxes.

· If the new sales tax referendum passes in November, HART will need over 7 BILLION DOLLARS in CAPITAL and another 7 BILLION DOLLARS for future OPERATING EXPENSES. Residents are already questioning the fact that the initial construction doesn’t even run to the airport.

· That means that 100% of Hillsborough County taxpayers will foot the bill for 2 to 3% of the population that actually ride the new Light Rail system.

· Hillsborough County has one of the highest unemployment rates in the State of Florida and shouldn’t burden its residents with more taxes during the worst economic times of our lives.

· The proposed sales tax increase would place Hillsborough on top as the county with the highest sales tax in Florida and subsequently discourage new businesses from opening up in the county.

· The one cent (14% sales tax increase) will adversely affect all of Hillsborough County businesses as folks will go to surrounding counties especially for “big ticket” items like autos, trucks, appliances etc.

· Tampa won the bid to host Superbowls and won the right to host the Republican National Convention in 2012 even while competing against cities that already have light rail systems.

· The (Hart) Bus Line reported that bus ridership was down by 3.1% this past fiscal year yet certain politicians say that Hillsborough County is setting record “Bus Ridership.” Blair said those record setting numbers stated by politicians are misleading; Fact- Every time someone steps on the bus, they are a rider; if they are going downtown from North Tampa, they are a rider on the way to downtown and they are a NEW rider on the way back to their origin — if they have to board a connector on the way —- they are again counted as a NEW rider (per Hart’s own admission).

· The world renown transportation professionals at the Center for Urban Transportation and Research (CUTR) located at the University of South Florida cited in different reports that the “Rail is likely to Fail” in Hillsborough County via the lack of densities, unforeseen cost over runs, maintenance and operation, and the unique county layout that is almost the size of the State of Rhode Island (H.C. is 1078.2 square miles -vs- R.I. 1221 square miles).

· The New Jersey Transit System (largest in the nation)) claims over 3 million riders per year yet it is still subsidized by over 1 billion dollars per year from the taxpayers of New Jersey. This does not even include the $700 million dollar capital depreciation loss annually. New Jersey was recently in the main stream news as being on the verge of bankruptcy.

· The USA Today newspaper wrote that if you expect rail to mediate congestion — think again; Rail and bus combined does not take more than 5% of the traffic off the road and the national average of folks with accessibility to rail is less than 20%. In fact, in many cases rail will have to cross roads that will create more traffic congestion.

· Sales tax is the MOST REGRESSIVE tax to the lower wage earners, and the proposed increase will further limit their spending capabilities.

· The federal government” has mandated that in ten years cars will get twice the MPG as cars of today do. We will have smaller vehicles (this allows many more cars on the road via measurement) through battery, hydrogen as well as many other fuel options. That’s why Toyota and Tesla just agreed to mass produce electric cars in California.

· Construction of a light rail system will NOT create some terrific number of jobs for Hillsborough County. Most of the raw materials needed for construction have to be purchased elsewhere.

· People are already comparing a proposed light rail system in Hillsborough County to one in Orlando which is funded by a “Tourist Tax” and one in Miami which is now referred to as “Metro Fail.” ( Not to mention that both communities have higher population densities than Tampa).”

“I want the good people of Hillsborough County to be aware that it only takes a simple majority of voters to pass a bill like this in Hillsborough County,” stated Blair. “The State of Florida has made changes for state wide votes so it takes 60% “yes” votes to pass a state referendum.”

“In times like this when we have been hit so hard by the recession, local government should be implementing two strategies; first, reducing unnecessary spending and second, investing tax dollars into money making projects, not into projects doomed to be heavily subsidized for generations to come.”

“The proposed Light Rail system is a luxury, not a necessity.”

“Please pass this message along to all of your friends and family members so we can stop this potentially decimating project.”

Website: http://brianblair.com

For interview opportunities to hear Brian Blair discuss the proposed “Light Rail Tax,” contact Eclectic Media Productions at: (813) 960-8412; (813) 389-0801; or info@mediaproductions.tv

#

Political advertisement paid for and approved by Brian Blair, Republican, for State House, District 47.

District 47 covers the majority of Northwest Hillsborough County.

Brian Blair is represented by Eclectic Media Productions PR Firm and their website is at http://mediaproductions.tv

New Women’s Colorblocked Nylon Jacket From Harley-Davidson

June 8th, 2010 No comments

Iconic Raglan Styling with Pink and Embroidered Graphics

MILWAUKEE (May 27, 2010) – The new women’s Colorblocked Nylon Jacket (P/N 97404-11VW, $125) from the Harley-Davidson® MotorClothes® line matches feminine-styled raglan sleeves with embroidered graphics to make a striking visual statement. It’s constructed from 100-percent nylon twill with a poly-mesh lining, featuring ribbed collar, cuffs and waist for easygoing comfort. Two hand-warmer pockets and one interior pocket offer spacious storage. Available in XS – 3W, Petite and Tall sizes.

The Colorblocked Nylon Jacket is available in July at most Harley-Davidson dealerships.

 

For additional information on Harley-Davidson MotorClothes products, see your local Harley-Davidson dealer or visit harley-davidson.com. To find a dealer near you, call 1.800.LUV.2RIDE in the U.S. or Canada.